Archive for December, 2004

Reaching maximum stadium capacity

Wednesday, December 8th, 2004

There certainly has been a lot of squawking of late when it comes to stadiums and the like in the metro New York area, with plans, proposals and debates on all fronts. Not like we’re the only area that goes through these kind of fights, (just read about the other schemes here,) but with such a densely populated area and so many different mindsets, we do enjoy a particularly turbulent roost to build your nest in. Let’s go through the proposals proposal by proposal:

Manhattan – Jets & 2012 Olympics

The one getting the most press at the moment is the proposed West Side Stadium (more here) over the LIRR yards. This is the crown jewel in the grand plans to land the 2012 Olympic Games, and the more long term west side redevelopment plans. The stadium itself faces lots of stiff obstacles but there are some in the current Bloomberg administration who are trying to fast track this facility through the review process all while keeping as much of it behind closed doors as possible.

As much as the sports nut in me loves new stadiums, I’ve come to the conclusion that having one in Manhattan — and especially in midtown — makes far too little sense. The separate yet attached plans to expand the Javits Convention Center make much more sense. As for the other proposed west side plans, I’m taking a more wait and see approach.

I’m more torn about the Olympic bid itself. Having the games in my back yard would be a great experience, but the more I think about all the added grief that would add before, during and after the less I want New York to win the bid. There are others who share that outlook as well (more here).

Brooklyn – Nets

Brooklyn has a fight of its own as well, with the Nets proposing an arena built on top of more LIRR yards along with sky-scraping office buildings and other facilities. Of course, to get this all done as the developers have the plans envisioned there will be buildings razed and neighborhoods changes. Too bad for them these are actually thriving neighborhoods, which of course is leading to protests against it. Still, the powers that be in government might use eminent domain to take the land by force. Having a sports team in Brooklyn again would be good, but it should not be done at the cost of community.

Newark – Devils

The Devils have been trying to get out of the Continental Airlines Arena since the mid ’90s. They had a plan in place some five years ago to build a new facility over the Hoboken rail yards, which was eventually defeated. These days the discussions are all about a move to Newark.

If the NHL ever starts playing again I could see this having one of the better chances of happening. Newark could use the positive exposure and redevelopment. Of course, this is North Jersey we’re talking about so I expect nothing to go smoothly. For an example you can look right across the Passaic river.

Harrison – Metrostars

Out of all the plans, I’m rooting the most for this one. Not that I’m a big soccer fan, but the area they want to move to has a great base for their sport. On top of that, the plan would take an empty industrial wasteland and turn it into something much better. Along with the soccer stadium there are major residential and business plans lined up to improve the area.

But with the Devils thinking of throwing roots down across the river, things might get sticky. Already some of the bills are back in committee so whatever time table they originally had has now been altered. Let’s hope that it’s only a delay and not a death march.

Bronx & Queens – Yankees and Mets

Now what would a stadium discussion be without the Yankees and Mets trying to get new ballparks? While they don’t have those generous offers that Giuliani gifted them anymore, there has been some real movement in the last few months.

The Yankees have plans to build a new park across the street (more here), which is more or less a good thing. Keeping them in the Bronx is good for the borough in the long run. Of course, that leaves the debate open on what to do with the old stadium. Ideas vary from making it a parking lot to turning it into a combination hotel, community ball field and hall of fame. Guess which plan I’m more in favor of?

As for the Mets, they’ve had their plans in place for quite some time, but the money has never quite been in place. Or maybe the stars were out of alignment. Whatever the reason, I foresee the new Mets park being built only after the Yankee situation gets hashed out. In fact, the Mets might have the Yankees to thank if the ball really gets rolling this time.

Meadowlands – Giants

The Giants are in a particularly strange situation, since they had already agreed to a renovation plan in 2003. Now with a change in state administrations and the flux the Meadowlands itself is in, they seem to have moved up in the want list and have their eyes on a brand new facility. The plus side in all of this is that the new governor wants them to have it. So long as the tax payers expenses are kept out of the equation (or are at least marginalized), I think this is pretty much a win-win situation.

But just as much as a new facility helps the club, a new mass transit link is much more important to the long-term health of the Meadowlands as a whole. Once again plans were approved under the last administration, which should make quite a few people happy as long as they haven’t been derailed since then.

Staten Island – NASCAR Race Track

And finally, Staten Island wants to throw in to this madness by trying to land themselves a NASCAR-level race track. I could see this happening, as the sport only continues to get more popular. Still I can’t see the fascination with it and their plans touch a sore spot with environmentalists who are trying to keep the already ecologically damaged borough intact.

Wow. That sure is a lot of activity. And we won’t know how it all turns out for a while yet — months in some cases, years in others. Let’s do a recap in a year from now to see how things have progressed, shall we? Until then, what do you all think of the situations? Pick one or rundown the whole list.

The Monday morning from HELL

Monday, December 6th, 2004

I’ve only been at work a few hours and already it’s far and away one of the roughest Monday’s I can remember having in a long, long time. I don’t know which deity I pissed off or what I did to incur this wrath, but I wish I did so I could go and set things right. It would make work a lot more tolerable.

And why has it been such an ordeal? Well, let’s start with the computer that won’t stop crashing. My usually stable office Mac got a RAM upgrade over the weekend and now I can’t even past to login screen without a kernel panic (for those of you who use Windows that’s like the dreaded blue screen of death, only a thousand times rarer). I would usually just get the IT manager to come and fix the system, but he’s out of the office until the 20th or so. So at some point I’ll have to go into my work computer and rip out the all the RAM and put them back in one by one to see which one is faulty. Or could it be multiple blocks of faulty RAM? *grumble*

Oh, and then there’s the fact that I worked through a good portion of my weekend building new screens for an upcoming product demo at work. That’s not the disagreeable part. The disagreeable part is when you’re told in a morning meeting that there is no way to integrate your work with everything else in time for the demo. The really disagreeable part is in knowing that your boss caused all this to happen because he didn’t make sure what he was asking for was techniclly and temperally feesible, and having those thoughts confirmed by fellow co-workers is jsut icing on the cake there.

It could be much worse, but not a great way to start the week. Let us hope this is all the bad juju I need face over the next seven days or so.

Tales of interest

Saturday, December 4th, 2004

The past week has been good as far as links of interest go, but it was quite lousy on time to post about them. Looks like another link dump for you all to enjoy:

You have found the golden chocobo. You are now mission complete.

Black days for baseball

Saturday, December 4th, 2004

Even for those out there who don’t follow baseball with any kind of regularity, it’s quite hard to avoid seeing its seedy underbelly right now. For years steroid use was talked about in hushed tones. Everyone knew it was an issue, but there was no proof. Meanwhile, the owners and players continuously avoided the issue in the hopes that it would go away.

Well, 2004 will have to go down as the year that cat came out of the bag. Ken Caminiti’s 2002 confession to SI about his steroid use was the first warning flag. His death in October was illustrative of the tolls that juicing puts on your body. Then this week the game was hit with the left-right combo of Jason Giambi and Barry Bonds being outed during grand jury testimony in the BALCO case. Giambi completely owned up to using while Bonds took the route more travled — dishing the blame elsewhere and feigning ignorance as to what he was using on his body.

Sad days, my friends. Sad days indeed.

I thought I had already lived to see the darkest of moment in baseball when the 1994 season was called on account of greed, but I was mistaken. In the following years the assaults on the single season and career home run records have propelled the sport from the depths to what some call a renaissance era. The McGwire / Sosa home run race in 1998 was credited with saving the very soul of the sport. Now it’s all very suspect, and the sport is looking at another scandal the size and scope of the 1919 Black Sox affair.

Every play, every stat, every record over the past 10 years must now be re-examined my a microscope. MVP seasons were made with the help of steriods. Baseball needs to out the cheaters to save the sport, and the record books must be altered liberally with asterisks. Yes, Bonds might have hit 73 home runs in a season, but was he juiced? Is the “clean” record McGwire’s 70? Sosa’s 66? Or is the record still Mr. Marris’ 61?

Let the debate begin.

With a little help from my friends (and other readers)

Saturday, December 4th, 2004

Q: What changes can I make to this site to make it better for those who read it?

I’ve been doing a lot of thinking about blogs as of late, partially due to the freelance work I’m currently engaged in. This has also been mixed in with a bit o’ feedback and the own ideas I have kicking in my head for my next redesign. So I’m asking those of you who partake in my particular brand of madness what direction you’d care to see things head in.

  • Do you like longer article-sized posts or the shorter, bite-sized ones?
  • Should I get more link heavy with my posting?
  • Are there any other features that you’d like to see added?
  • Is everything right with the world and am I a fool for wanting to change it?

The more feedback, the better. Now that all the world knows what a blog is, the standards are being upped ever so slightly. So what if this is all just some overly-consuming personal hobby? It’s a hobby I take quite seriously, damnit! ^_^