Posts Tagged ‘International’

Sorrow for the Spaish

Thursday, March 11th, 2004

At least 182 dead. More than 900 wounded. Keep a thought in your heads for those in Spain who suffered through that country’s worst terrorist attack ever (also here). One of the first hand accounts reveals just how horrific an event this was:

“After a second explosion, people dropped everything, bags and shoes and ran, many trampling on others,” he continued. “People didn’t know which way to go. Some even went into the train tunnels without thinking other trains could be coming.”

It’s thought that this is an attack by the ETA, the militant Basque Homeland and Freedom in Euskara group. As interior minister Angel Acebes puts it: “I do not have the least doubt that it is E.T.A.”

Remember those things we said they had? Well they didn’t. Ooopise!

Friday, January 30th, 2004

For those of you still trying to find ways to justify the war in Iraq, your task has just gotten that much harder. According to this pleasant little article, when it came to juding a nation’s weapons threat our intelligence community truley knew nothing. Pakistan, Libya and North Korea were far greater risks with their weapons development than Iraq was since the end of the Gulf War.

Said the CIA’s former chief weapons inspector, David Kay:

.”The regime was no longer in control. It was like a death spiral.”

Yeah, that sure sounds like the summation of the greatest threat to organized freedom the world has ever known. Some are saying the president was fed bad intel which helped influence his decisions to go to war, but I find that to be total horse shit. Seems to me more like they just turned a blind eye to the things that didn’t backup their planned forceful intervention and blew out of proportion those things that could help their cause. I am personally ashamed that I too fell for the exaggeration of information.

And even if bad intel is the reason the president pushed us into battle, it’s still shame on him for not making sure on his facts before taking the steps. Cursory glances of morning briefing agendas aren’t good enough when the course of history and the lives of your citizens are at stake.

Short-sighted steps into the world of tomorrow

Friday, January 30th, 2004

The cosmos are twitching and that’s sending everything here on Earth into full blown flux. It’s a world that heralds the death of exstacy and birth of liberal talk radio. A world where winters are once again cold and snow is brutal (so much for global warming!). A world where Mars is under attack from the Earth and the president is pimpin’ dads plan from 1989 to land humans on the surface.

It’s this last bit of sound bite fodder that I want to address. Personally, I’m all for exploration and I think revisiting the moon and going to Mars are noble goals. NASA has for far too long been spinning its wheels and the private sector is on track to catch up sooner instead of later (see the X-Prize for proof of that), not to mention Europe and China wanting in on the action. Having lofty goals will serve the agency well, will give the youth of the nation something to set their minds to wonder and interest when talking about space instead of just boredom, and will give us a whole host of new compounds, gadgets and doodads that will need to be developed for the missions and will eventually filter down and become intwined in with our everyday lives. The only phenomena I’ve seen throughout history that can spur on technological development at the same feverish rate as lofty goals such as these is war, and I’d much rather have space be the midwife of invention instead of the bullet.

But Bush’s $1 billion extra to the NASA budget is just not going to get us there. It’s the hydrogen car all over again: a token addition to the budget so he can get his positive sound bite, but never to be heard of again. In addition, the rearranging of NASA’s budget is going to come at the cost of things like the Hubble Telescope, which has done far more to promote learning about the creation of the universe then many other programs. Hubble is set to be de-activated by 2010 and this half-assed attempt to curry favor with the public is the last nail in the coffin.

I like the notion, but I’m afraid the execution is going to lack much in its current state. Another case of this administration living far too short-sighted, even with their ultra long term goals. How would I do it better? To be honest, I haven’t the foggiest at the moment, but I do know when I hear something that won’t work and this plan certainly falls into that category.

Iraqi justice will finally be served

Tuesday, December 16th, 2003

Not like it’s news anymore, but for posterity’s sake this past Sunday Saddam Hussein was captured by US forces. I was notified on my way back to New Jersey via a cell phone text message that my friend Brian received. Ain’t technology grand?

As for my opinion on bringing Saddam into custody, it’s a good thing. Of course, I’ve never doubted that Saddam is evil. I’ve just doubted the way the war has been handled from start to muddled middle.

What a mess we’ve made: Thoughts on Iraq and first hand accounts of its rebirth

Wednesday, October 1st, 2003

There is a great deal about the War in Iraq I’ve detested. The way our country was mislead into taking action with tainted intelligence (which includes myself); the way the President and his staff railroaded their war against Saddam through congress; the way we flat out bypassed the UN and took the burden of being a liberator squarely on our own shoulders and against the will of many in the world. These are all black eyes that the Bush administration, not to mention the United States itself, will have a long hard road recovering from, if they ever can fully recover.

With all of that said, we still do have to remember that Saddam was indeed a malicious dictator who abused his people and his power. The people of Iraq, while going through a tumultuous change now filled with uncertainties, are better off without him. Don’t believe me? Try reading this excellent first hand account of the rebirth of Iraq and telling me that. Example:

Yet, Yasser admits: “The first fortnight, I was really, really depressed. Everyone in Iraq had been totally conditioned to wait to be told what to do by the state. Anybody with initiative got tortured or killed by Saddam, so people just waited for orders. So even after the liberation, they couldn’t understand that they were free; they didn’t know what it meant. But then I saw that gradually they were realising, and that day by day they were sort of defrosting.”

As for the immediate future of Iraq, our collective hands are going to have to stay intwined in it. Calls from both the left and the right now speak of distancing our nation from the mess we’ve made, strengthen by the way the mass media presents us with pictures and accounts of bombings and sound bites of Anti-American rallies from the Iraqis themselves. However, that would be a short sighted solution that would harm everyone all around:

There is a terrible fear among many Iraqis that they will not be able to match the Kurds’ achievement if they are abandoned by the Americans once again. “The memories of 1991 are so vivid,” says Sama. “People still fear that somehow the Americans will abandon us and Saddam will claw his way back from the grave. They say, `It happened in 1991, it could happen again.’ That’s one crucial reason why people are reluctant to cooperate with the coalition.” She adds: “I find it absolutely incredible that the anti-war people are now calling for the coalition to leave straight away. Nobody in Iraq wants that. The opinion polls show it’s just 13 per cent. Don’t they care about the Iraqi people and what they want at all? This isn’t a game. This isn’t about poking a stick at George Bush. This is our lives.”

Like it or not, we’re in this for the long haul. Bypassing the UN on our decision to make war is now going to bite us in the ass during our attempts to cultivate peace, as shown in the cool reaction to G.W. Bush’s most recent address to the Generally Assembly. It’s going to take saying “I’m sorry” and the willingness to give away a great deal of control in the process of rebuilding Iraq to the masses to even begin to fix America’s shattered image, but it seems as thought out current commander in chief refuses to see the obvious.

Regardless of who sits in the oval office after the 2004 election, they are going to have to deal with the Iraq situation well into their term because to abandon the people we liberated from oppression would be just as bad, if not worse, than the call to war itself. A mess was made on our behalf and we have to make sure it gets cleaned up.

Of course, in my opinion part of the cleaning begins with wiping the current administration from the White House.